Micro-decisions — visual

Pick from the mockups. Reply with the numbers (e.g. "1B, 2 neutral, 3 keep, 5A").

Story / naming — decide now
1L02/L03 chat — who's the agent?

It's the OLD agent (pre-Floom). Now it wrongly says "Floom".

OpenClawonline
Done. Report sent.
Checking tomorrow's pipeline…
A — OpenClaw only
OpenClawonline
Hermesonline
+ 3 more agents
B — OpenClaw + Hermes (the category)
your agentonline
Done. Report sent.
Checking tomorrow's pipeline…
C — generic "your agent", no brand

AI: Gemini 3.1 Pro → A (single villain makes the narrative sharper and the contrast with Floom stronger) · Codex → A (keeps the villain sharp; the failure feels specific, not generic)

2L02 chat — which platform?

VO says "available via WhatsApp." Style the chat as:

WhatsApp (green)
OpenClawonline
draft ready
approve?
Telegram (blue)
OpenClawonline
draft ready
approve?
Neutral glass (current)

AI: Gemini 3.1 Pro → Neutral (abstracted UI maintains premium Vercel-grade aesthetic without dating the film) · Codex → Neutral (preserves the premium Floom palette; VO handles the WhatsApp reference)

3L14 on-screen line
current: "people spending time / on work they shouldn't."

Keep this, or tighten the line? (tell me the words if you want a change)

AI: Gemini 3.1 Pro → Tighten: "Stop doing work you shouldn't." (active voice hits harder, accelerates pacing before the payoff) · Codex → Tighten: "hours lost / to work that can run itself" (names the lost hours directly)

4L16 subtext under "time is life."
current: "the work runs. you get the hours back."

Keep, change the line, or drop the subtext (just "time is life.")?

AI: Gemini 3.1 Pro → Keep (grounds the abstract "time is life" in a concrete, undeniable product benefit) · Codex → Keep (turns the closing thought into a concrete product promise without over-explaining)

5Closing CTA

AI unanimous = A minimal. Pick:

Floom
floom.dev
A — minimal (AI pick)
hire your first agent
floom.dev
B — button
(no CTA — end on "time is life")
C — none

AI: Gemini 3.1 Pro → A (quiet confidence; minimal mark and URL perfectly match the premium, restrained aesthetic) · Codex → A (minimal mark plus floom.dev feels premium; lets the film end with confidence) — unanimous A re-confirmed

Product content — confirm against the refined beats
Items 6–10 (the prompt example, which triggers, which model providers, the GitHub card, copy tone) are product-card content. The 10/10 loop + your active-item-focus refinement are reshaping these right now — so decide them against the refined product beats once that render lands, not a static mock. I'll resurface them visually there.